Eurokd
European KnowledgeDevelopment Institute
Language Teaching Research Quarterly

e‐ISSN

    

2667-6753

CiteScore

  exclamation mark

1.2

ICV

  exclamation mark

124.94

SNIP

  exclamation mark

0.604

SJR

  exclamation mark

0.283

CiteScore

  exclamation mark

1.2

ICV

  exclamation mark

124.94

SNIP

  exclamation mark

0.604

SJR

  exclamation mark

0.283

SCOPUSEBSCOProQuestCrossrefIndex CopernicusMIAR

Perspective Article

Considering Generative AI in Language Education in HE: The Perspectives of Learners, Teachers and the Language Centre

Language Teaching Research Quarterly, Volume 51, Pages 184-202, https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.51.01

This contribution examines the risks and affordances of new technologies, such as generative artificial intelligence, for language learning, teaching and assessment, paying special attention to higher education. Based on a synthesis of recent literature, we argue in support of e.g., Gao (2024), González-Lloret (2024), Kern (2024), or Thorne (2024) that language learning and language use is at its core a deeply human endeavour, which cannot be outsourced to technology. Based on our central thesis that humans in language education cannot be replaced by technologies, we then summarize affordances and limitations posed by technology in language education, before we look at a strategic level from an institutional perspective. Based on these insights we synthesize the new roles, needs and demands that emerge for languages teachers and learners in the era of GenAI. We illustrate these theoretical deliberations with concrete examples from one large language centre in the North of Germany, covering the strategies developed at the institutional level, the supporting measures offered for and developed with teachers as well as the approaches taken to include students in the discussions about the role of technologies in language education.

Loading PDF…
next

Page 1 of

next

Download Count : 52

Visit Count : 87

Publisher’s Note

The claims, arguments, and counter-arguments made in this article are exclusively those of the contributing authors. Hence, they do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the authors’ affiliated institutions, or EUROKD as the publisher, the editors and the reviewers of the article.

 

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

 

Funding

Not applicable.

 

CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement

Claudia Harsch: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Resources, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing

Anika Müller-Karabil: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Resources, Writing - Original Draft,

Astrid Buschmann-Göbels: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Resources, Writing - Original Draft

 

Generative AI Use Disclosure Statement

We did not make use of AI when preparing and writing this manuscript.

 

Ethics Declarations

World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki–Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants

We did not involve human participants.

 

Competing Interests

No, there are no competing interests.

 

Data Availability

We did not collect any data for the literature synthesis reported here.