
Original Research
The rapid development and availability of Generative AI (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, offer new possibilities for academia, yet they also raise concerns for academic integrity. Chapelle's (2024) seminal work on GenAI’s implications serves as an impetus for this study, which explores teaching academic integrity in the context of AI use. Chapelle frames GenAI as an ‘inflection point’, calling for a re-evaluation of pedagogical strategies to support students in understanding its technological and ethical implications. This article presents findings from a mixed-methods study at a university in Cyprus, where ESL undergraduates in academic writing classes engaged with ChatGPT. Participants with B2/C1 English proficiency from diverse cultural backgrounds were assessed through pre- and post-intervention evaluations and qualitative interviews. A semester-long intervention incorporated activities to enhance academic writing skills and comprehension of ethical AI use, focusing on critical thinking, proper citation, and policy adherence. Findings indicate that students demonstrated increased AI knowledge and awareness of academic integrity. This study contributes to the discourse on integrating GenAI in academia, providing insights into effective instructional practices and addressing ethical considerations in academic writing. It offers guidance for educators and institutions aiming to integrate GenAI responsibly, ensuring academic integrity remains central in second language education.
Download Count : 31
Visit Count : 104
GenAI; ChatGPT; ESL; Academic Writing; Academic Integrity; Higher Education
Publisher’s Note
The claims, arguments, and counter-arguments made in this article are exclusively those of the contributing authors. Hence, they do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the authors’ affiliated institutions, or EUROKD as the publisher, the editors and the reviewers of the article.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive and insightful feedback, which greatly contributed to the improvement of this manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement
Katarzyna Alexander: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation; Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Project Administration.
Christine Savvidou: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Project Administration.
Generative AI Use Disclosure Statement
Generative AI was used only for language refinement during manuscript preparation. It did not generate substantive content, analyses, or research materials. All AI-assisted edits were reviewed and approved by the authors.
Ethics Declarations
World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki–Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants
The study complied with ethical standards for educational research, informed consent was obtained from all participants, and all data were fully anonymised.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.