Eurokd
European KnowledgeDevelopment Institute
Language Teaching Research Quarterly

e‐ISSN

    

2667-6753

CiteScore

  exclamation mark

1.2

ICV

  exclamation mark

124.94

SNIP

  exclamation mark

0.604

SJR

  exclamation mark

0.283

CiteScore

  exclamation mark

1.2

ICV

  exclamation mark

124.94

SNIP

  exclamation mark

0.604

SJR

  exclamation mark

0.283

SCOPUSEBSCOProQuestCrossrefIndex CopernicusMIAR

Original Research

A Four-Stranded Approach to AI-Assisted Pre-Class Learning Modules: EFL Teachers’ Practices in Designing Daily Conversation Content for Flipped Classrooms

Language Teaching Research Quarterly, Volume 49, Pages 90-112, https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.49.05

This study examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools with Nation’s Four Strands Framework in the design of pre-class learning modules for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) flipped classrooms. Focusing on conversational skills development—a domain requiring balanced attention to meaning-focused input/output, language-focused learning, and fluency—the research addresses a critical gap in material design for technology-mediated flipped instruction. Employing a qualitative case study methodology, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with six Indonesian EFL teachers at the tertiary level. Data analysis revealed a four-phase pedagogical model wherein AI tools were systematically deployed to: (1) scaffold meaning-focused input (e.g., AI-generated transcriptions, text adaptation), (2) reinforce language-focused learning (e.g., grammar/vocabulary feedback systems), (3) facilitate meaning-focused output (e.g., conversational AI prompts), and (4) enhance fluency development (e.g., adaptive speaking drills). Key challenges emerged regarding AI’s limitations in contextual appropriateness, feedback reliability, and the risk of pedagogical fragmentation, necessitating teacher mediation to preserve theoretical fidelity. The study contributes to literature on flipped learning by demonstrating how AI can operationalize SLA principles while affirming educators’ central role in curricular decision-making. Practical implications for instructional design and teacher professional development are discussed, alongside recommendations for future research on AI’s efficacy across diverse institutional contexts.

Loading PDF…
next

Page 1 of

next

Download Count : 163

Visit Count : 436

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback, and the Indonesian EFL teachers whose participation made this study possible.

 

Funding

Not applicable.

 

Conflict of Interests

No, there are no conflicting interests. 

 

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. You may view a copy of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/