
Original Research
To investigate how task complexity cognitive factors influence the lexical complexity in essay writing, this study was guided by Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis (CH) and Skehan’s Limited Attentional Capacity Model (LACM), and examined the effects of task complexity on lexical complexity in undergraduates’ essay writing. Using Lu’s Lexical Complexity Analyser (2010, 2012), the study analysed essays written by 60 undergraduates across 25 dimensions of lexical complexity, following the SSARC grouping method by Robinson and Gilabert (2007). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test evaluated the relationship between pre-existing standardised writing scores (PS) and the essay outputs under the experimental condition (QM), focusing on lexical density, lexical sophistication, and lexical variation dimensions. Findings indicate that verb sophistication and the Uber index are significantly associated with higher proficiency, supporting Robinson’s CH, which links cognitive resource allocation in complex tasks to improved language proficiency. Noun variation also emerged as significant, aligning with recent studies emphasising lexical diversity in writing. However, measurements like lexical density and type/token ratio showed no significant differences, suggesting a limited role. The study highlights the importance of sophisticated lexical use; however, it also acknowledges that cognitive resource limitations, as posited by Skehan’s LACM, may constrain the deployment of more complex lexical structures.
Download Count : 83
Visit Count : 144
Task Complexity; Influence; Lexical Complexity; CET4 Writing
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank the participants and research assistants for their contributions, and the support provided by the affiliated institutions. We gratefully recognise Dr. Nguyen Truong Sa for the valuable assistance in this study.
Funding
We gratefully acknowledge funding support from the Post-graduate Research Scheme (PGRS), UMPSA, Project No. 230339.
Ethics Declarations
This study adhered to the ethical considerations of the experimental university. All participants gave informed consent, and all research activities were conducted in compliance with institutional ethical guidelines.
Conflict of Interests
No, there are no conflicting interests.
Open Access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. You may view a copy of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/