
Original Research
The study explored the impact of proficiency, frequency, L1 – L2 congruency, and semantic transparency on the knowledge of multi-word units (MWUs) among Iranian L2 learners (N = 256). A gap-filling test was used to assess learners' productive knowledge, employing a high-frequency MWU list created with the lemmatised concgramming method. The list, which included 11,212 MWUs across four frequency levels, was ranked by L1 – L2 congruency and semantic transparency. As revealed by regression models with bootstrapping, the results showed a significant positive correlation between MWU knowledge and proficiency (IELTS scores). It was observed that knowledge of MWUs decreased with lower frequency, and participants scored higher on congruent and transparent items. The study also found that frequency and semantic transparency influenced IELTS scores, with a significant interaction between congruency and incongruent items. These findings underscore the crucial role of L1 – L2 congruency in learning MWUs and provide hope for educators, as they offer insights to enhance learning by prioritising L1 – L2 congruency in English MWU resources. This study's findings can potentially lead to improved language teaching methodologies and curriculum design, offering a pathway to optimise learning outcomes.
Download Count : 89
Visit Count : 130
IELTS Score; L1 – L2 Congruency; Lemmatised Concgramming Method; Multi-word Units (MWUs); Semantic Transparency
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive feedback, which have greatly improved the quality and clarity of this manuscript. Their thoughtful suggestions and attention to detail were invaluable in refining the work.
Funding
This research was supported by Flinders University, which provided funding for the creation of a collocation list.
Ethics Declarations
This study was approved by the Flinders University Human Research Ethics Committee (Project number 4365).
Conflict of Interests
No, there are no conflicting interests.
Open Access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. You may view a copy of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/