
Review Article
Our purpose is to highlight the contributions of TalkBank initiatives to improved understanding of clinical impairments in adult and child speakers and examine remaining challenges and proposed solutions.We review the origins and development of TalkBank initiatives that have targeted a wide array of typical and atypical child and adult populations. In particular, we discuss how such sets of data have given rise to evaluation and validation of traditional measures used to appraise spoken language performance. The durable contributions of AphasiaBank and CHILDES archives are already evident in a body of published research that has re-evaluated, refined and reconceptualized how we evaluate and set therapeutic goals for speakers with expressive speech and language impairments. More recent archival initiatives, such as PhonBank and FluencyBank, are also making impacts. Beyond improvements in basic and applied science in communication development and disorders, archival data are also being used to test and improve accessibility for communicatively impaired speakers. TalkBank has transformed how research in communication disorders is conducted. It no longer relies on small, unshared research ventures that enable limited clinical impact or follow-up research inquiries. Rather, it has enabled large-scale, more generalizable research more likely to spur further research and enable more rapid translation to clinical practice.
Download Count : 56
Visit Count : 115
TalkBank; Language Disorders; Aphasia; Fluency; Dementia
Acknowledgments
In addition to the invaluable contributions of Brian MacWhinney, both to my own work, and the global language science community, the author acknowledges the support of the TalkBank community over the years. The author wishes also to thank Davida Fromm for her always generous input and feedback.
Funding
Work cited in this article authored by Nan Bernstein Ratner and colleagues has been supported by the following organizations and grants: NIDCD R01DC015494 to Brian MacWhinney; National Science Foundation BCS1626300 to Brian MacWhinney and Nan Bernstein Ratner; and NIDCD R01DC017152 to Nan Bernstein Ratner.
Conflict of Interests
No, there are no conflicting interests.
Open Access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. You may view a copy of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/