Eurokd
European KnowledgeDevelopment Institute
Language Teaching Research Quarterly

e‐ISSN

    

2667-6753

CiteScore

  exclamation mark

1.2

ICV

  exclamation mark

124.94

SNIP

  exclamation mark

0.604

SJR

  exclamation mark

0.283

CiteScore

  exclamation mark

1.2

ICV

  exclamation mark

124.94

SNIP

  exclamation mark

0.604

SJR

  exclamation mark

0.283

SCOPUSEBSCOProQuestCrossrefIndex CopernicusMIAR

Original Research

The Comparative Effect of Recasts and Prompts on EFL Learners’ Vowel and Consonant Accuracy

Language Teaching Research Quarterly, Volume 28, Pages 31-52, https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.28.02

This study examined the comparative effect of recasts and prompts on EFL learners’ pronunciation accuracy of consonants and vowels. Eighty-nine elementary EFL learners were selected among 117 through their performance on a piloted sample KET and were randomly assigned into two experimental groups (recast, prompt), and a control group. A piloted researcher-made pronunciation pre-treatment test was administered to the three groups to measure their pronunciation accuracy before the treatment. The three groups underwent the same amount of teaching time and received the same material. The participants in the recast group received recast and those in the prompt group received prompt. However, the participants in the control group received no specific type of corrective feedback. At the end of the treatment, the participants took a pronunciation post-test parallel with the pre-treatment test. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was run. The results indicated that both recast and prompt had a significantly positive effect on EFL learners’ pronunciation accuracy of consonants and vowels. Moreover, the results showed that there was no significant difference between the effect of recast and prompt on EFL learners’ pronunciation accuracy of consonants and vowels.

Loading PDF…
next

Page 1 of

next

Download Count : 780

Visit Count : 2003

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.


Funding

Not applicable.


Conflict of Interests

No, there are no conflicting interests. 


Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. You may view a copy of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/