Eurokd
European KnowledgeDevelopment Institute
Language Teaching Research Quarterly

e‐ISSN

    

2667-6753

CiteScore

  exclamation mark

1.2

ICV

  exclamation mark

124.94

SNIP

  exclamation mark

0.604

SJR

  exclamation mark

0.283

CiteScore

  exclamation mark

1.2

ICV

  exclamation mark

124.94

SNIP

  exclamation mark

0.604

SJR

  exclamation mark

0.283

SCOPUSEBSCOProQuestCrossrefIndex CopernicusMIAR

Original Research

A Collaborative Approach to Assuring Standards: Using the CEFR to Benchmark University Pathway Programs’ English Language Outcomes

Language Teaching Research Quarterly, Volume 26, Pages 18-38, https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.26.02

The past decade has witnessed growing interest in Higher Education (HE) achievement standards and the comparability of program learning outcomes. The HE sector has historically focused on assuring academic standards through two key approaches: standardized educational testing and external peer review of assessment. Both approaches are resource and time intensive. In particular, the English Language Teaching (ELT) sector, which provides international students with Direct Entry (DE) pathways to English medium university study, has been predominately focused on high stakes English language testing. Commercially available tests enable providers to demonstrate clear evidence of ELT DE program standards in terms of internationally recognised scores. English language tests, however, represent only one type of external reference point for assuring standards. This paper provides an overview of a sector-led, collaborative approach to external review of assessment across 20 Australian university operated DE English programs. Twenty-eight ELT units were benchmarked by sixty individual assessors using consensus moderation against the newly expanded Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR), a validated language proficiency framework. This case study demonstrates that collaborative benchmarking using the updated CEFR can effectively ensure DE ELT program standards to the benefit of staff and students globally.

Loading PDF…
next

Page 1 of

next

Download Count : 122

Visit Count : 1508

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.


Funding

Not applicable.


Conflict of Interests

No, there are no conflicting interests. 


Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. You may view a copy of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/