Eurokd
European KnowledgeDevelopment Institute
Language Teaching Research Quarterly

e‐ISSN

    

2667-6753

CiteScore

  exclamation mark

1.2

ICV

  exclamation mark

124.94

SNIP

  exclamation mark

0.604

SJR

  exclamation mark

0.283

CiteScore

  exclamation mark

1.2

ICV

  exclamation mark

124.94

SNIP

  exclamation mark

0.604

SJR

  exclamation mark

0.283

SCOPUSEBSCOProQuestCrossrefIndex CopernicusMIAR

Original Research

The Difference in Formative Writing Assessment Procedures among Novice and Experienced Teachers

Language Teaching Research Quarterly, Volume 10, Pages 74-88, https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2019.10.07

The present research investigates the associations among teacher assessments for foreign language (L2) writing and relevant teaching experiences of L2 writing. This study also seeks to address teachers' employment of formative evaluations for lessons of General Studies amidst teaching practices, teacher formative evaluation perceptions upon carrying out formative evaluations for General Studies, the prevalent approaches of formative evaluations, the accordance of evaluation methods with learning tasks, the intervention of teachers upon receiving feedback from their students, issues in classes and student feedback. Thirty English teachers from a language institute in Iran assessed 10 essays by students and validated their marks using three qualitative statements. Findings of this study indicate the lower marks of the writing teachers with the most experience compared to the teachers of less experience for four of the ten total essays. Upon conducting an analysis for the qualitative statements pertaining to the four essays, it was shown that experienced teachers submitted more negative comments on issues such as general language, ideas, language fluency, and general organization. Essentially, despite various experiences in instructing composition, such groups of teachers may be similar or different in terms of other variables that may contribute to divergences and similarities for their ratings.

Loading PDF…
next

Page 1 of

next

Download Count : 230

Visit Count : 1731

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.


Funding

Not applicable.


Conflict of Interests

No, there are no conflicting interests. 


Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. You may view a copy of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/