
Original Research
Over the past three decades, the role of written corrective feedback in improving L2 writing has been controversial. Although, a considerable amount of research has investigated WCF from a range of perspectives, limitations in the research design of many studies call into question the validity of their findings, thereby reducing their generalizability. This paper aims to further WCF research by investigating these limitations and offering suggestions for possible research designs, identifying key contextual variables and target structures, considering the roles of explicit and implicit knowledge, individual differences, and teachers’ WCF proficiency levels and WCF beliefs.
Download Count : 154
Visit Count : 1643
Written Corrective Feedback (WCF); Writing; Research Design Deficiencies; Explicit And Implicit Knowledge; Individual Differences
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Conflict of Interests
No, there are no conflicting interests.
Open Access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. You may view a copy of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/