Perspective Article
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into task-based language teaching (TBLT) promises personalized learning at scale. Yet without grounding in the rich tradition of individual differences (IDs) research, AI risks reducing learners to simplified variables and substituting algorithmic accommodation for genuine cognitive engagement. This paper builds a bridge between established ID-TBLT research and emerging AI design. We critically synthesize how cognitive IDs (working memory, attentional control, language aptitude) and affective IDs (motivation, anxiety, enjoyment, boredom, and flow) interact with task complexity to shape L2 performance—acknowledging both established findings and persistent debates. From this synthesis, we articulate design challenges for AI-mediated TBLT, distinguishing what is technically feasible from what requires further research, and acknowledging inherent tensions (scaffolding vs. substitution, personalization vs. equity, detection vs. privacy, flow vs. instructional efficiency). We then extend this framework through Bui's (2026) longitudinal study of learner perceptions in AI-assisted speaking tasks, using empirical findings on learner adaptation and "prompt literacy" to illustrate and refine our design challenges. The result is a dual contribution: a systematic translation of ID-TBLT research into AI design challenges, and a refined, six-frontier research agenda for developing intelligent, adaptive TBLT systems that are cognitively grounded, affectively attuned, and ethically responsible.
Download Count : 1
Visit Count : 46
Individual Differences; TBLT; Task Complexity; Working Memory; AI in Language Education
Publisher’s Note
The claims, arguments, and counter-arguments made in this article are exclusively those of the contributing authors. Hence, they do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the authors’ affiliated institutions, or EUROKD as the publisher, the editors and the reviewers of the article.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the editors and reviewers for their constructive feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Funding
We received no fund for this research project.
CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement
Yanzhen Tan: Conceptualization, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing
Yawen Han: Conceptualization, Writing - Review & Editing
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen: Conceptualization, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing
Generative AI Use Disclosure Statement
Portions of the literature synthesis and the refinement of the research agenda were developed with the assistance of DeepSeek AI. All intellectual content, theoretical framing, critical analysis, and final editorial decisions remain the sole responsibility of the authors.
Ethics Declarations
World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki–Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants
Not applicable due to the nature of the paper.
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Data Availability
There is no data available because of the nature of the paper.