Practitioner Inquiry
This study examines the integration and progression of High-Leverage Practices (HLPs) in a Chilean English language teacher education practicum program. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed documentary evidence and survey data from 283 preservice teachers and seven tutor teachers to assess HLP implementation across practicum stages. Findings revealed inconsistencies in HLP exposure, with gaps in structured progression affecting teachers' confidence and instructional adaptability. While HLPs exposure was associated with improved classroom management, misalignment in mentorship and feedback practices hindered optimal application. Some HLPs, such as lesson planning and student engagement, are well-integrated, whereas others, like real-time formative assessment and differentiated instruction, are inconsistently addressed. The study proposes a structured model for progressive HLP integration, ensuring coherence between theoretical instruction and classroom practice. Findings highlighted the need for targeted mentorship training and refined assessment frameworks to support pre-service teachers effectively. This research contributes to practice-based teacher education, emphasizing the importance of systematic HLP progression for developing confident and adaptable educators.
Download Count : 105
Visit Count : 287
core practices; practice-based learning; practicum experiences; teacher education; high-leverage practices (HLPs)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the program’s faculty, pre-service teachers, and tutor teachers whose participation and insights were essential to this study.
Funding
This research was supported by the Second Research Fund for Faculty Members of the English Language Teacher Education Program at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Ethics Declarations
This study followed ethical guidelines for research involving human participants. All participants were informed about the purpose of the study and gave their voluntary consent. Anonymity and confidentiality were guaranteed throughout the research process.
Conflict of Interests
No, there are no conflicting interests.
Open Access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. You may view a copy of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/