All Journals

Language Teaching Research Quarterly

European Journal of Studies in Management and Business

International Journal of Behavior Studies in Organizations

Studies in Educational Management

New Challenges in Accounting and Finance

Language Testing in Focus: An International Journal

Marketing and Branding Research

Individual Differences in Language Education: An International Journal 

Feedback Research in Second Language 

Management Issues in Healthcare System

Language Teacher Education Research

Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Development

<p style="text-align:justify;">Writing for social engagement in an academic context indicates the authors’ attitude towards the propositional&nbsp;content and the text’s audience through metadiscursive maxims markers employment. This study tried to&nbsp;determine whether there are any differences in metadiscourse marking in research articles across different&nbsp;disciplines and different quartile ranks. To this end, Abdi’s (2010) CP-based model of metadiscourse marking&nbsp;was used to study how writers use metadiscursive maxims markers to see any differences in metadiscourse&nbsp;maxims marking in their writings. To this end, we selected 193 research articles from recently published&nbsp;journals (2018-2020) and balanced them based on size. Then, we carefully went through them and extracted&nbsp;maxims markers manually. The results showed that the cooperation categories of quality, quantity, manner, and&nbsp;interaction were widely used among philosophy writers, which can help understand, study, and teach this&nbsp;critical area of language use. This empirical study of academic writing helps us attend to hidden rhetorical&nbsp;features and strengthen interpretation.</p>

A Study of the CP-based Model of Metadiscourse Marking across Disciplines and Q1-4 Journals

Original Research 

ltrq.2021.24.05.xml